File size of various text processors Word processor To compare the sizes of empty files and files with text. I've tried to test file sizes of the different word processors
You have an 120 GB harddisk and only operate on that. You'll see it shrink between 2 and 12 times. Once you work on aĭocument and depress "Save" many times, you will soon have a document Versions too) cumulate additional information to the Word files such asĭocument info, languages used, and earlier versions.
MS Word 6 and above (that goes for Windoze Microsoft Word 5.1a andīelow make very small files. Word 5.1a keeps files smallįile size is another crucial issue. The ex-USSR), especially in combination with Apple's world scriptĪnother advantage of MS Word 5 (and above) is that it allowsįor changing the menus and creating shortcuts. Left-to-right alphabets (such as modern European languages, languages of Operating with right-to-left alphabets (such as Hebrew, Yiddish,Īrabic), but MS Word 3 and later should be used by authors working with
Nisus Writer for the Mac is THE choice for authors
Very stable Claris Works, Apple Works, or Word Perfect, Te圎dit, BBEdit, No other text processing programs allow for that, neither the You are a linguist, a philologist or just anybody operating withĭifferent languages in the very same text, you will need several openĭictionaries for text proving passages in languages that are not native More than the Custom Dictionary that ships with MS Word. A normal monolingual text user may never need anything The real supremacy of MS Word (versions 3 and later, inĬlassic OS's) is that it allows for the use of multiple open customĭictionaries. It sounds interesting and is worth going on with. Once installed on a Macintosh with OS X, It can emulate even a Macintosh 8.6 and thus recover the lost functionality of Microsoft Word version 5.1a. As I found out, it is a Macintosh Classic emulator originally developed for Linux. Hubert at the Arkansas Cancer Research Center wrote an interesting contribution to my Guestbook (entry of January 20, 2005) about the Sheepshaver software. The UNIX base of Macintosh OS X is another comfort - Word 5.1a is rock-solid. Printing from Word 5.1a is no longer an issue under Macintosh OS X.3. I upgraded my iMac from the Jaguar to Panther in December 2004, and my Classic OS was upgraded to OS 9.2.1 (from 9.1). The world is not that lost as I believed in terms of upgrading the Operating System. Only the etchy dotted fonts you were viewing in OS 6, and so are the You can read and type yourĭocuments - with the above mentioned deficiencies - but the screen shows In Macintosh OS X, the Word 5.1a game is practically over.
Sherlock that allows for the same functions.
YouĬan live without the Find File function, because Mac OS 8.5 introduced Plug-in such as EndNote Module cannot be used correctly any more. More of the functionality, but MS Word 5.1a never causes the crashes.įrom Mac OS 8.5, the Find File function is disabled. Operating systems can be destabilized by MS Word 5.1a (i.e., theyĮxperience frequent crashes), later operating systems exclude more and A compromise of high functionalityĪnd high stability is found in Macintosh OS 7.6 to 8.6. MS Word version 5.1a has proved durable and in some ways more stable Originally introduced for the Macintosh Operating Systems 6.x and 7.0, Shipped by Microsoft in late November 1992, Word 5.1a'sįunctionality was superseded probably only by Word Perfect, but theĪnimosity for Word Perfect was chiefly found among non-linguists. Of view, Microsoft Word version 5.1a for the Macintosh is the best text (as hodja Osama must also admit the advantage of several US and WestĮuropean products, such as US made aircraft.). Eriks notes on Why I love Microsoft Word version 5.1aĪlthough I despise the Microsoft Corporation and MS WindowsĪbout as much as Osama bin Laden despises the USA and WesternĬivilization, I must admit the advantages of several Microsoft products